Neil Kakkar
1 min readDec 30, 2018

Yeah, that’s not what I meant.

It’s easier to achieve the same thing, is what might be more appropriate. You have tools now that do the same thing as vim, minus the learning curve. So, for them, why would they chose to learn vim?

You see, I’m arguing both sides here.
For a specific minority, yes, it’s useful — the kind that don’t get access to the modern tools; the handicap I talked about earlier. Vim is the best tool for the job here.

I like it too, that’s why this post.

For others, it’s not really that useful. To be able to do the same things they are doing now ( maybe a bit faster) — by putting in all that effort.

Sign up to discover human stories that deepen your understanding of the world.

Free

Distraction-free reading. No ads.

Organize your knowledge with lists and highlights.

Tell your story. Find your audience.

Membership

Read member-only stories

Support writers you read most

Earn money for your writing

Listen to audio narrations

Read offline with the Medium app

Neil Kakkar
Neil Kakkar

Written by Neil Kakkar

I write about Code and Life philosophies. Sometimes both. | https://neilkakkar.com | Engineer @PostHog | Write (Code). Create. Recurse.

Responses (1)

Write a response

Well, you might be arguing for both sides, and one of them may be a minority. But you might be terribly mistaken with regards to who that minority actually is.
Just to be clear, I’m not advocating the use of vim to everyone. It isn’t for everyone. But those it is for, aren’t necessarily ‘handicapped’, as you say.

--